4.09.2013

ACTIVITY 18



           Today, I had a lesson with my students that had as its aim to present the different way the Greeks and the Americans perceive family relationships. What is more, the students were urged to use conditionals while discussing the subject. The truth is the students found the subject interesting as, having grown up in Greece, they could not imagine that their American friends, they were discussing with through Skype, had no relationship with their second cousins. The use of conditionals was constant as there were a lot of questions like: Who would you invite to your birthday party if you lived in Greece?
            All students were more or less engaged in learning. The least engaged was my female student. I think this was because when selecting the subject I didn’t take into consideration that the student is an only child with no extended family so most of the questions did not appeal to her.
            The activity lesson began with a small extract of Jay Leno’s show Tonight on some pranks people played to their friends and family on April’s fool. Though this may seem irrelevant to the subject, one of the pairs called to talk about their prank revealed to Jay Leno that they were second cousins. The presenter immediately answered “You’re not even related” and this was the cause of our very long discussion. The video fired up the lesson as after watching a video with pranks everyone was in a very good mood. Two of the students found the pranks so funny that they couldn’t stop laughing so it took sometime to make them stop and start the Skyping session. During the Skyping session and because the questions used were planned before the Skyping session everything went well.
            The students remained focused throughout the Skype session. I don’t think they could actually do otherwise because they are talking to people they don’t know and there is some embarrassment there in any case… After fifteen minutes or so they started getting tired and that’s when their answers began getting shorter and shorter. By then my colleague from Pennsylvania and I had accomplished what we wanted, though so we could wrap the conversation up.
            After the Skype session the students were grouped in two groups based on their learning preference. They were introduced to the Internet game “The Millionaire’. The game works similar to the actual TV game only difference being the fact that all the questions are based on Conditionals. The team that finished the game having earned the largest amount of money was the one that got to propose the song we’d listen to in our next lesson (a very easy way to find new songs to teach).
            As my students worked I moved among them to check how they were thinking before they actually got to answer the questions of the game. This gave me valuable information on what they do or don’t remember on Conditional so I could provide the ones that had trouble with more online material to do if they wished at the end of the class. Moving among groups of students while they work is for me an ideal way of gathering the information needed to understand whether my students have problems different language patterns.             

ACTIVITY 16



a.         The curriculum and relevant policy documents I follow do not have much to do with the curriculum of the «Νέο Σχολείο» as I do not work for the public sector. Having read the «Νέο Σχολείο» law I find that some of the elements may agree with the development of my curriculum but that’s about it.
            Making a curriculum is not an easy process. My curriculum is very rarely based on a coursebook and is sort of an upside down process. It starts with the goals I’d like to reach by the end of the year. Then I break my year plan into “units” which I call learning elements. The skills my students should possess by the end of these units are very clear and I give plenty of time to myself in order for my students to reach the goals I’ve set.
b.         I do not currently use a coursebook but when I did I carefully selected the material I used so that I could follow the curriculum I had already designed and then I could assess my students using other means. 
           
The assessment mechanisms I use are diagnostic, formative and summative with focus on summative assessment which I have to say I prefer. I never formally test the students. I like giving out puzzles and games or realia that trigger the use of the English language in different contexts. Assessment is an on going process for me and I have lately copied an assessment page from a Finnish school that is based on what students can or can’t do and not on their test scores. I find this process more enjoyable and it finally gives a clearer picture both to me and to my students as to what they can or can’t do with the language. 

ACTIVITY 12



A.
MANOLIS
My student Manolis is a very interesting young man that likes being challenged. He has a logical-mathematical intelligence preference and enjoys working alone. If I didn’t know Manolis and I just heard him speak, I’d guess he is at least 10 years older than he is. He has drawn a lot of his knowledge from the Internet. He is the one that introduces me to all the cool things that usually appear on Youtube, including many series of videos based on Mathematics and science. His knowledge of the world combined with the fact that he has practically grown up alone (comes from single parent family and rarely sees his parent) have turned him into a logical thinker.
ANTONIS
My student Antonis is a bright young man who prefers working with a partner while sitting still. His intelligence preference is practical and struggles with the improvement of his level for the past two years. Before entering this class Antonis was a fan of “all things Greek” and had nothing to do with English. Neither as a language nor as a culture. So, despite his hard effort he always remained a step behind everyone else.
ANNA
My student Anna is a vivid young woman who has just started understanding the concept of the English language. Anna likes working in pairs with music and her learning preference kinesthetic. Until recently she studied English because her parents had told her so and not because she wanted to. But lately she seems more interested in the language itself and has started chatting with a girl from the US in her free time in order to improve her speaking.
PANAGIOTIS
My student Panagiotis is a quiet person that prefers working alone. His intelligence preference is logical-mathematical and is deeply into English. His while culture seems to be affected by the lessons he has and this also shows to his speaking with people whose mother tongue is English.

B.        I tried grouping Panagiotis with Manolis based on the fact that their learning preference is the same. Although notices that they enjoyed working on different types of puzzles together, I found that their relationship became very antagonistic toward the end of the task. While grouping Anna with Antonis proved very interesting as both students cultures seem to be very similar.
            I also tried grouping all the men together and I grouped myself to my female student. This seemed fun and I got to connect a bit more with my student Anna. 

ACTIVITY 9



A.        I’ve been teaching my four C2 students for the past year and there are still many things I’d like to know about them. Apart from information on the environment they live and spend most of their time in (school and home) that I already have since the beginning of the year (I run a series of interviews during the first week of the school year), I know a lot of things regarding the people they spend a lot of time with, their best friends etc.
            Many times though, I feel I need to learn more things regarding their feelings in the lessons. Now that sometime has passed I feel my students have a very accurate picture of the lessons. I also feel one of them has a negative affect of herself as a learner. I’d like to ask them how they feel when they enter the class. Is this an environment that pleases them? Do I actually help them learn anything? Do they like working with people from other places around the world? Or do they feel uncomfortable? Do they feel the level of the class is too high, or too low? Can they co-exist with the other students in the class? Would these people be their friends after the end of this year? This last question is very important for me. I base a lot of my work on the fact that the class is one team – united. A small unity in which, we are all equal and all treated with the same respect.

B.                                            QUESTIONNAIRE
Please read carefully and tick the correct answer:


I disagree
I somewhat disagree
I somewhat agree
I agree
I totally agree
1.
Every time I enter the classroom I have positive feelings.





2.
Every time I enter the classroom I feel I am in a secure environment where I can talk about anything that bothers me.





3.
It is very easy for me to discuss in the classroom things that bother me in my personal life. 





4.
I sometimes feel I don’t know enough in order to actively participate in the class’ activities.





5.
I sometimes feel ashamed of “my English” when I have to talk to people from the UK or the IS.





6.
I’d prefer it of I weren’t asked to participate in activities that involve my speaking to people I don’t know.





7.
I’d prefer it to be able to prepare at home before I have to discuss on an unknown subject.






            After designing the above questionnaire, I gave it to my students to answer at their own ease. Here are the results:


I disagree
I somewhat disagree
I somewhat agree
I agree
I totally agree
1.
Every time I enter the classroom I have positive feelings.



50%
50%
2.
Every time I enter the classroom I feel I am in a secure environment where I can talk about anything that bothers me.


25%
25%
50%
3.
It is very easy for me to discuss in the classroom things that bother me in my personal life. 
25%

25%
50%

4.
I sometimes feel I don’t know enough in order to actively participate in the class’ activities.
50%
25%
25%


5.
I sometimes feel ashamed of “my English” when I have to talk to people from the UK or the IS.
50%
25%

25%

6.
I’d prefer it if I weren’t asked to participate in activities that involve my speaking to people I don’t know.
75%



25%
7.
I’d prefer it if I could be able to prepare at home before I have to discuss on an unknown subject.
75%



25%
           
C. & D.  After I received the results I tried grouping the students in two pairs. I grouped together the one that answered he would preferred to have time to prepare at home on question number 7 with the one that answered she felt ashamed of her English.  Then I gave the students the Readings of Practice Test 1 to study at home before they would have to talk about them to people from the US they didn’t know. I noticed the students felt more confident and used their English more.
            On another day I grouped a student that answered “I agree” on question 3 with the one that answered “I completely disagree” and started a discussion on personal relationships. I found that the student who had answered “I agree” urged the other one to speak more during the activities.
            In general using different groupings I understood that deeper and more meaningful understanding on the students’ emotions and feelings is vital for DI and I will surely be using the approach a lot in the future.


ACTIVITY 6



I am going to refer to the same C2 class I’ve referred to in the previous activities. This is an exam-oriented C2 level class. As I have mentioned before, there is no actual coursebook for the class apart from some C2 level testbooks I use in order to familiarize the students with the content of the exams they are taking at the end of the year. So, I am going to refer to one of the C2 tests I am using as what I call “introduction test” at the beginning of the year. This means a test that I use in order to explain to the students the format of the exam.

A.        The book is: Forget, M., Betsis, A., Succeed in ESB/UCLan Level C2 Practice Tests, Andrew Betsis ELT. The first activity of Practice Test 1 is a Listening Exercise comprised by three parts. The aim of the exercises is to assess the learners in terms of their listening ability. The first and second parts of the listening carry 10 questions all based on the same interview. In the third part there are three short dialogues on different subjects, for which the student has to answer 10 more questions. Though the listening exercises may be serving the purpose in terms of assessing the students’ ability to listen, but the truth is that in the first part of the listening the more familiar the student is with the subject of the interview, the easier it is for him/her to answer the questions even without listening to the actual interview. Are the parts if the listening sense making? Well, I’m not sure this is the purpose for which the specific book was designed. But, as I’m more often than not using the book to “introduce” different subjects to the students, I’d say using the interview on its own as a listening tool doesn’t actually make sense.
The second part of the test carries two one-page readings followed by multiple choice questions. The “problem” that appears in the first part of the listening where the more familiar someone is with the subject the easier it is for him to answer questions, makes its appearance once more. Again, this is a very static activity for which more often than not the students are advised to use a companion in order to make sense of the reading itself.
The Test proceeds with 20 multiple choice questions followed by an open close and a transformations exercise. All these are very static and overall non sense making and boring for the average teenager. At the end of the Test the students face the challenge of writing 350 words on one of the subjects discursive essays proposed to them.

B.        In general, though this first Practice Test is meant to test students on the C2 level I usually try to turn it into something more interesting. Regarding the listening part I usually introduce the subject to the students through a visual. The subjects of the C2 level exams are most of the times real subjects. This means that there is a lot of material on the net regarding their topics. The topic of Practice Test 1 Listening Section A and B of the book is about Muslim women wearing the veil in Britain. First of all, a lot of the times teenagers know nothing about the veil… I usually introduce the subject with an introductory video on the Muslim culture. What does it mean for someone to be a Muslim? What does it mean for a woman to be a Muslim? Are there any rules? Then I try to relate the subject to something my students are already familiar with. For example: Are there any rules Christian Orthodox people should follow? How are they different to the ones the Muslims have to follow? I usually try to find videos or even lectures from different Universities around the world that are current. Rarely do I use something older than 5 years. I think the language and the interests of people change, so I do my best to stay current. This usually promotes a vivid conversation among my students.
For Practice Test 1, Reading I usually have the students read it on their own first. Something I did sometime ago and was a real hit, was to give the same reading exercise to some students in Pennsylvania, USA Middle School that we usually Skype with. I sent the 2 Readings along with their questions to the colleague in the US and asked if he could arrange that I Skype with my four students with four students of his class. The colleague had given the Readings to his students to read and answer the questions. When we started Skyping my students were assigned to a partner in the US. Their partner had to explain to them anything they hadn’t understood on the Reading’s context as well as correct their mistakes. The fact that there was another teenager at the other end of the world reading the same text and going through all the trouble of explaining them what the correct answers where and why motivated my students to work harder.
For the last part, Use of English, I don’t usually do much. Many times I try to find extra videos on the Internet explaining different grammatical phenomena. For some weird reason, my students listen more carefully to some unknown teacher from the other end of the world. I also introduce different games such as Revising Conditionals through the Billionaire game I found on the Internet. For each correct question the students win $ 10,000 and in the end the game rewards them with their own Certificate of Participation! Who wouldn’t revise Conditionals after that?
Last but not least the Writing Part can be a real trouble. Taking into considerations that the students very rarely write 350 word essays in their mother tongue, I try to help the students understand how they should start thinking and analyzing the subject they are given to commend on. As I’m never given the opportunity to teach “writing” from the start I usually have to teach students who, coming from lower levels, expect to be fed with plans and ideas on how to write. I firmly believe that we shouldn’t feed the students with our thoughts and ideas rather we should feed them with as much world knowledge as possible. Given the fact that the C2 level exams are designed for adults, most of the subjects the students are asked to write about are unknown to them. I lately found out that two of my C2 students aged 15 knew nothing on the fall of the Berlin Wall. So, I urge my students to watch videos and documentaries on their own before they start writing their essays. This can be done either in the classroom through their tablets, laptops, class projector, mobile phones or before they come to school through videos I upload in the classrooms blog.
World knowledge is in my opinion what connects the students to the real world. Among other things, the real world speaks English as well…                                

ACTIVITY 4



OBSTACLES BETWEEN ME AND TRULY DIFFERENTIATED TEACHING
2
 My students taking exams at the end of each year is one important obstacle between me and truly differentiated teaching. I am considered as the teacher that takes students to final exams. I usually meet my students at the beginning of a school year and goodbye them at the end of it. In the last 15 years of my teaching career I have never taught anyone for more than a school year. This is considered a very successful feat where I come from, but for me it is an important obstacle. 
1
Having to teach test curriculum. Whatever I do, I eventually have to refer to the test.
4
Class size. The classroom where I teach is very small. The desks are placed in a specific way so that the classroom fits the largest possible number of students. We can barely move in there…
3
Not enough time to prepare. I teach both one to one and language school lessons.  From September to May my only free time is usually spent on sleeping. I know this is no era to complain about overworking but I truly believe schools should pay for hours of preparation. DI takes a lot of it anyway.

B.
Obstacle marked as number one depends on the educational system as it stands today. When it comes to foreign languages they are viewed as an opportunity for the students to acquire more certificates and therefore, more points to enter the public sector once they are presented with the opportunity. Greek students do not learn the language fir the benefits they may be able to seize later in their life but because they are forced by their parents to get the highest possible certificate. 
Obstacle marked as number two is a combination of the factor I just mentioned and the policy of the school I work for. In the school I work for I only teach C2 level students. This is because of the fact that for the past 10 years I’ve been working for the school, none of the students has failed getting the C2 certificate. This has made the management insist on my working with this class and only.
Obstacle marked as number three depends on the Greek educational system and the way it has persuaded school owners that they should not spend money on their teachers. In my opinion, it is urgent that we understand that teachers should be paid for the time they spend outside the classroom preparing. The more money spent on preparation, the better the results.
Obstacle marked as number four depends on the school’s environment. Though the school I work for promotes DI, when I asked for a round table they answered they could not sacrifice a whole classroom to fit only five students. I understand their point but I think environment is really important for DI too.  

D.
Removing obstacles number one two and three is not at all easy. It asks for a change in the Greek culture which I’m not sure it can easily happen. The parent s of teenagers grew up in the 80s when getting the highest certificate was of the utmost importance. Maybe in about 20 years or so when the students of today become parents themselves there is the chance that they understand and promote languages for what they are, and that is a means of communication.
Removing obstacle number four is a matter of time. It’s been three years now I try to persuade the owners of the school to change the sitting arrangement. I believe I will succeed, any time now…